
Suggested Criteria for Service Contract Negotiation
1. MLB
(mini-landbridge -- West Coast discharge / rail to E. Coast) vs. AW (All water)
service differential. For one service
contract, there is a 22.5% premium for MLB service compared to AW service
costs.
2. The base
"unit" for negotiating the volume commitment should be TEUs (20'
equivalent units). A 40' (regardless if
reefer or Hi-Cube) would count as 2 x TEUs.
If applicable, a 45' container would also count as 2 x TEUs. A
40' container's price could be the "starting point" around which the
other prices are based.
3. Free time is
normally 2 days on reefers and 5 days on DV (dry vans). The comparative service contract that ANERA
offers textile importers allows 15 days free time for DVs. Since they do not need reefers (actually
offer a 10% discounted price if textiles are moved in refrigerated boxes--
treated as if they were DVs), there is no free time designation for that type of
container.
4. Uniformity of
rates between ports. In theory, there
should not be a rate differential between Baltimore and New York. North Atlantic ports (Norfolk to Boston) are
typically treated under the same tariff rate.
5. For shipments
that may be purchased on a CIF or CFR basis, in which the oceanfreight is
prepaid by the supplier, can containers be moved under the SC (service
contract) to qualify for the volume pledged?
6. What is the
"liquidated damage" for a "shortage" in the number of
containers shipped vs. that committed?
On a TAA (Trans-Atlantic Agreement) SC, the "liquidated
damage" was as little as $250/TEU.
Obviously, with a low "liquidated damage", it may be worth the
"risk" to commit a higher volume if the unit price can offset
possible "shortages".
7. Is it
possible to offer an "incentive discount" if initially "x"
TEUs are committed, while "x + 100 + 200 + 300, etc." are actually
shipped? At which point could a price
reduction "kick in"?
8. Reasonably,
the more TEUs that can initially be pledged, the lower the unit
cost. At what point will price breaks
take place? Get a price at 300 TEUs,
400 TEUs, 500 TEUs, etc. Do not
"play your hand" by giving away the total that you anticipate. Instead, let each "bidder" give
you their "best rate" for 20' DV, 40' DV, 40' HQ (High Cube Dry Van),
and 40' reefer (presumably, as it is rare to encounter, you have no 20'
reefers). This "best rate"
should be based on the "what if" scenarios of increased TEUs pledged.
9. Recently,
there is a lot of pressure on ANERA (Conference) to reduce their costs to
compete with the NVOCC (Non-vessel operating common carrier) and independent
carriers that serve the Far East. In
fact, for the textile import shipper's association, in December, many of the
ANERA member lines reduced their 40' standard DV rate by $400.
For the 1996
negotiation, the textiles importers association is seeking at least a $600
concession from the rates of last year ($200 further reduction over those
unilaterally offered by member lines in December). To give you a "base" idea, a sampling of rates for the
textile association effective 5/1/95 were...
AW Service MLB Service
$2420 20' $2965
$3225 40' $3750
$3630 40' HQ $4445
These rates
were basically "ALL IN" (all inclusive of various ancillary charges
such as CAF - Currency Adjustment Factor, FAF - Fuel Adjustment Factor. also
known as "bunker surcharge", DDC - Destination Delivery Charge.
really a terminal handling charge).
From some Far East origins, there may be "arbitrary" fees
(loading from ports that commonly do not offer direct service to the U.S.), and
in certain "lanes" one or more of the above ancillary charges may
apply. This is clearly stipulated in the
SC.
10. Review what
commodities shipped would qualify for the SC.
In theory, you should be able to obtain one price for all 20', 40', 40'
HQ, or Reefers, regardless of the commodity shipped. However, since you have experienced differing prices based on
commodity, have this clearly clarified.
11. The suggestion
is made to seek a comparison among the following...
ANERA member (for instance,
Maersk)
Hanjin
Evergreen
NVOCC
If you give each the identical
criteria to "bid" on your business, you can then ably compare
"apples to apples".
12. Request
service assurances as to the following ...
transit times sailing frequencies, equipment availability, and offices
that would be dealt with for the carrier in the U.S. and overseas.
13. Request if
it is possible to offer an "incentive to renegotiate" the contract if
it appears during the course of the year that your volume may dramatically
increase, or that you may contemplate giving more containers to one carrier,
while maintaining the "minimum" commitment to the other carrier. Alternatively, request if it may be possible
to negotiate the SC for a period less than one year and then negotiate the
balance of the year subsequently.
14. How are
instructions to your suppliers made to ensure that the SC is used and credit is
given toward the volume commitment?
15. What ways
does the carrier have to give you a summary to "audit" the amount of
money paid on a unit basis -- to ensure you are not being overcharged? Concurrently, as we discussed, you may want
to keep some sort of "spread sheet" review to ensure the correct
pricing is being assessed.
16. Are there
origin charges in the shipper's currency that would be incurred by the
shipper? Normally, on an FOB terms of
sale; any wharfage, THC (terminal handling charge), port tax, etc. at origin
port / point of receipt of the container are for the account of the seller
(shipper). Indirectly, you will be
paying the FOB costs, which would be accounted for in the seller's pricing.
17. As we
discussed, many services assess ancillary charges that may fluctuate with
changes in "bunker oil prices", currency exchange rates, DDCs, THCs,
port surcharges, etc. Normally, the
adjustment is made on a quarterly basis, if it applies. Suggest you get a clarification of any
ancillary charges that may apply for certain "lanes" (from certain
ports / points of loading) and when adjustments may be made, if they apply.
Also, as
this may be a "two edged sword", ask the carrier to give the
advantages and disadvantages of getting a "base rate + ancillaries"
compared to an "all in" rate.
The "all in" rate should have to account for the ancillaries
in their "all in" price.
18. If your
existing carriers happen to ask you "what kind of reduction" would
you expect for this coming year, the range of reduction that ANERA is proposing
for textile goods is in the 15-20% range.
Perhaps, that may be a starting point, assuming your volume commitment
to the existing carriers may remain the same over the coming year. Of course, we may not be comparing apples to
apples, since there is a different industry involved and the magnitude of the
volume being negotiated is over 18,000 TEUs compared to your volume.
19. When
deciding how many carriers to use, you may want to consider...
- The advantage of one carrier
keeping the other "honest" as opposed to "putting all your eggs
in one basket".
- The disadvantage of
negotiating with two or more carriers versus negotiating with one carrier from
a volume (and subsequent price) perspective.
- Service advantages of having more than one carrier.
- Deciding what "percentage" of business to give one
carrier vs. the other carrier(s).